Martin Authors vs AI Grisham, Martin, Picoult among 17 to sue OpenAI new

Martin Authors vs AI Grisham

NEW YORK: John Grisham, Jodi Picoult, and George R R Martin are among 17 authors suing OpenAI for “systematic theft on a mass scale”, the latest in a wave of legal action by writers concerned that artificial intelligence programs are using their copyrighted works without permission.
In papers filed Tuesday in federal court in New York, the authors alleged “flagrant and harmful infringements of plaintiffs’ registered copyrights” and called the ChatGPT program a “massive commercial enterprise” that is reliant upon “systematic theft on a mass scale”.

The suit was organised by the Authors Guild and included David Baldacci, Sylvia Day, Jonathan Franzen & Elin Hilderbrand among others.

“It is imperative that we stop this theft in its tracks or we will destroy our incredible literary culture, which feeds many other creative industries in the US,” Authors Guild CEO Mary Rasenberger said in a statement. “Great books are generally written by those who spend their careers and, indeed, their lives, learning and perfecting their crafts. To preserve our literature, authors must have the ability to control if and how their works are used by generative AI.”

Martin Authors vs AI Grisham
WhatsApp Group Join Now
Telegram Group Join Now
Instagram Group Join Now

ChatGPT generated unauthorised prequel to ‘GoT’ with the same characters: Lawsuit
The lawsuit cites specific ChatGPT searches for each author, such as one for Martin that alleges the program generated “an infringing, unauthorised, and detailed outline for a prequel” to “A Game of Thrones” that was titled “A Dawn of Direwolves” and used “the same characters from Martin’s existing books in the series “A Song of Ice and Fire.”
In a statement Wednesday, an OpenAI spokesperson said the company respects “the rights of writers and authors, and believes they should benefit from AI technology. We’re having productive conversations with many creators around the world, including the Authors Guild, and have been working cooperatively to understand and discuss their concerns about AI. We’re optimistic we will continue to find mutually beneficial ways to work together.”

Earlier this month, a handful of authors including Michael Chabon and David Henry Hwang sued OpenAI in San Francisco for “clear infringement of intellectual property”.
In August, OpenAI asked a federal judge in California to dismiss two similar lawsuits, one involving comedian Sarah Silverman and another from author Paul Tremblay. In a court filing, OpenAI said the claims “misconceive the scope of copyright, failing to take into account the limitations and exceptions (including fair use) that properly leave room for innovations like the large language models now at the forefront of artificial intelligence.”

Author objections to AI have helped lead Amazon.com, the country’s largest book retailer, to change its policies on e-books. The online giant is now asking writers who want to publish through its Kindle Direct Program to notify Amazon in advance that they are including AI-generated material. Amazon is also limiting authors to three new self-published books on Kindle Direct per day, in an effort to restrict the proliferation of AI texts.
Microsoft announced this month that it would provide legal protection for customers sued for copyright infringement over content generated by its AI tools.

In a major development for the literary world, 17 renowned authors, including John Grisham, George R.R. Martin, and Jodi Picoult, have filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, the company behind the popular ChatGPT language model. The authors allege that OpenAI has engaged in “systematic theft” by using their copyrighted works to train its AI models without permission.

The Basis of the Lawsuit

The lawsuit claims that OpenAI’s ChatGPT model was trained on a massive dataset of text and code, which included copyrighted material from the plaintiffs’ books. This, the authors argue, constitutes a violation of their copyright rights. They further allege that OpenAI has used ChatGPT to generate derivative works, such as outlines for sequels to their novels, without their consent.

Specific Examples

The lawsuit cites several specific examples of alleged copyright infringement. In the case of George R.R. Martin, the authors claim that OpenAI generated an unauthorized prequel to “A Game of Thrones” titled “A Dawn of Direwolves.” Similarly, John Grisham is said to have been targeted, with OpenAI allegedly creating outlines for sequels to several of his popular legal thrillers.

Impact on the Literary Community

This lawsuit has sent shockwaves through the literary community, raising concerns about the potential impact of AI on the future of authorship. If authors are not able to control how their work is used by AI algorithms, it could have a significant impact on their incomes and creative freedom.

OpenAI’s Response

OpenAI has yet to issue a formal response to the lawsuit. However, in a previous statement, the company has said that it takes the rights of creators seriously and is committed to working with authors to ensure that their work is used in a responsible and ethical manner.

The Implications for the Future

The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the future of AI and its relationship with the creative industries. If the authors are successful, it could set a precedent for how AI companies can use copyrighted material to train their models. It could also lead to changes in the way that AI is used in the creative process.

Beyond the Lawsuit: Ethical Considerations of AI in Authorship

The lawsuit against OpenAI raises important ethical questions about the use of AI in authorship. While AI has the potential to be a powerful tool for writers, it is important to ensure that it is used in a way that respects the rights and creativity of human authors.

Possible Outcomes of the Lawsuit

There are several possible outcomes to this lawsuit. The court could find in favor of the authors, which would set a precedent for how AI companies can use copyrighted material. Alternatively, the court could find in favor of OpenAI, which would give AI companies more leeway to use copyrighted material in their models. It is also possible that the two parties could reach a settlement out of court.

Martin Authors vs AI Grisham

Thank you so much for exploring our website. Please get in touch for more upcoming informative updates, offers, and AI tools. we are going to announce some offers as soon as possible for visitors. Leave a comment if you have any kind of query.

Conclusion

The lawsuit against OpenAI is a significant development in the ongoing debate about the role of AI in the creative industries. The outcome of the case could have a major impact on the future of authorship and the way that AI is used in the literary world.

I hope this article has been informative. Please let me know if you have any questions.

FAQ:

What authors are against OpenAI?
What authors are suing over ChatGPT?
Who is John Grisham suing?
Why are authors suing OpenAI?
Why are big name authors suing OpenAI?
Who owns most of OpenAI?
Who is majority owner of OpenAI?
Who is OpenAI funded by?

Thanks So much

Team Teach AI Open

www.techiopen.com

AI Tool Insights

1 thought on “Martin Authors vs AI Grisham, Martin, Picoult among 17 to sue OpenAI new”

Leave a Comment

Google Bard AI can now generate images, New Updates 2024 9 New Meta AI Experiences Across Our Family of Apps and Devices